Future Positive SynEarth CommUnity of Minds Future Positive

Always tell only the truth, and all the truth, and do so promptly – right now.” —Buckminster Fuller

SEARCH

Editors

Home

AboutUs

TalkToUs

HelpUs HelpYou


Understanding Human Intelligence

Acting Locally


Reason Writes

My World of
Ought to Be

Timothy Wilken

Understanding Order (PDF)

BIAS systems

A Synergic Future

Ortegrity

Dual World

GIFTegrity

Gift Economy

CRISIS (PDF)

Helping Others

Facing the Truth

Synergic Consumption

UnCommon Science

Time-binding

Beyond Democracy

Synergic Consensus

Barry Carter

Permanent link to archive for 7/1/02. Monday, July 1, 2002

Along with Alfred Korzybski, R. Buckminster Fuller, Arthur Young and N. Arthur Coulter,  Edward Haskell was one of the leading pioneers of synergic science. His books have been out of print for many years. It is an honor to again make one of the classics of synergic science available. The following is the introduction to the first chapter of Full Circle: The Moral Force of Unified Science.


What Generalization of Mendeleev's Periodic Table Means

Harold G. Cassidy 

I would like, first, to summarize briefly the theoretical ideas present in Haskell's work as I have observed them appear and develop over the last twenty years to their present fruition. Then I would like to suggest in summary their meaning for the field of Education.

In my opinion, Haskell has discovered a scientifically-based pattern of a universal kind which is displayed in some respect by all of human knowledge and experience of Nature and Man. This is a large statement. Propositions of this kind have been advanced since the earliest days of philosophy, and in view of the signal lack of agreement among philosophers throughout the ages and today, it behooves us to be extremely wary of such statements. Yet strange things have been happening in science; and if I say that, in my opinion, this pattern that Haskell has discovered (and such discovery inevitably involves a degree of creative invention) constitutes an invariant-relation that enables translation between various developing fields of knowledge and experience, then at least metaphorically one can understand me to mean that like the Lorentz Transformations it makes the applicable relativity tolerable.

I assume then, that my task is to summarize the theoretical and empirical bases of this statement. That is, to give support to the hypothesis that Haskell has here a universal pattern; to show its nature and empirical reference; and to make it plausible for scientists to give it their attention. The pattern with which we are concerned is made up of several sub-patterns. I shall summarize each of these, as I see them, then put the whole together.

Read the full article: What Generalization of Mendeleev's Periodic Table Means


Edward Haskell

New online version of  Full Circle: The Moral Force of Unified Science

Read more about Haskell's work in UnCommon Science 
Also see:  The Relationship Continuum and Understanding Order


 
July 2002
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
 
1
6
13
20
27
 
Jun   Aug


Copyright 'fair use' Notice

This page was last updated: Wednesday, July 3, 2002 at 8:41:03 AM
TrustMark 2008 by the SynEARTH.network.

Create your own Manila site in minutes. Everyone's doing it!